The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel, concluded that Israeli security forces intentionally attacked and destroyed the Al-Basma IVF Center , the main fertility center in Gaza. Israeli security forces destroyed all the material stored there, which was to enable Palestinians to have children in the future.
The commission concluded that they did this with the intent to exterminate the Palestinian people in Gaza as a group, in whole or in part, and that this was the “only inference that could reasonably be drawn from the acts in question.”
The commission states in its report that it had found no evidence that the Al-Basma Center was a legitimate military target at the time it was attacked by Israeli security forces. It concluded that “the destruction of the Center was a measure intended to prevent births among Palestinians in Gaza, which is a genocidal act under the Rome Statute and Genocide Convention..”
Anjli Parrin, lawyer and director of the Global Human Rights Clinic (GHRC) at the University of Chicago Law School, told ARIJ that the attack on the Al-Basma Center was devastating and that, based on the available information, this constitutes strong evidence of international crimes.
She stated that the Center enjoyed special protection under the laws of war and - being the largest fertility Center in Gaza, storing thousands of embryos, eggs, and unfertilized sperm - was of the utmost importance to Palestinians seeking to have children. The destruction of Al-Basma Center had caused thousands of Palestinian families to lose hope of a better life, an irretrievable loss.
Parrin gave testimony on the reproductive health Centers in Gaza and the destruction they suffered to the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel.
Parrin presented the commission with the events experienced by the Al-Basma Center before it issued its report on Israel's use of reproductive violence against Palestinians in Gaza.
“While genocide is often a process made up of many different events and acts, the UN Commission of Inquiry found the attack on the Al Basma Center to be one of the most important individual pieces of evidence in making its findings”.
She explained that two elements must be present before a conclusion of genocide can be reached: physical acts of mass extermination, and a mental element - specific intent on the part of the “alleged” perpetrators. Therefore, it is necessary to prove that killing has occurred – or, in this case, that the IVF center was attacked, resulting in the physical act of preventing births, which constitutes genocide - but also that the genocidal acts were conducted with the intent to destroy the group, in whole or in part.
Parrin, who is also an assistant clinical professor of law at the University of Chicago, pointed out that, in most cases, the most difficult thing to establish is intent. But the commission of inquiry found in September 2025, based on the evidence it had collected, that “Israeli security forces knew of the function of the clinic and intended to target it and destroy the reproductive material within.”
Parrin said that the commission had concluded - based on its assessment of the Al-Basma attack and further evidence of targeting of other maternal health facilities in Gaza - that both the intent elements and the physical elements of the crime had been established.
In her opinion, the ARIJ investigation into what happened at Al-Basma adds further weight to this assessment, and also paints a detailed picture of what actually happened around the clinic during the attacks, which strongly supports the commission's conclusions.
Parrin believes that ARIJ investigation - which includes eyewitness accounts of Israeli army tanks close to the Al-Basma clinic as well as a finding that Israeli forces controlled the immediate area during the period of the alleged attack help to further bolster the evidence of the possible perpetrator.
Muhammad Halim says he has not forgotten the difficult days he lived through during the siege on El-Galaa Street. He says that when they left, “We agreed that we wouldn’t move in twos, so that if they targeted one of us, someone would still be alive to tell the story.”
This investigation was published in Arabic on the following: