“I get scared whenever my father is out of the house. He doesn’t realise it, by I’m overcome with fear,” says 14-year-old Maryam.
Her parents were unable to register her, because they did not have a validated marriage certificate. There were many reasons for this.
But the key one was that she did not have her mother’s passport or anything to prove her identity. After her mother died, she lived in constant state of fear and anxiety because
of her and her father’s precarious legal status in Jordan, and the associated dangers.
Such fears are well founded, given that her father faces a real risk of being detained and deported,
because he has no valid work permit and his residency has expired. The same fears prevent Mado and others from trying to formalise their situation and be legally compliant.
According to a report from Amnesty International entitled “Imprisoned Women, Stolen Children,” unmarried women in Jordan face the problem of having their newborns forcibly taken away from them,
since the law regards them as “illegitimate”. The Amnesty report details the case of a Bangladeshi domestic worker who was held in administrative detention for over four months for committing the
“crime of adultery.” During her detention she gave birth, and her baby was taken away from her. She was not even told where the child was, despite her asking repeatedly and pleading to see him.
In another case, a female worker from Indonesia who had been raped twice was imprisoned for three and a half years, without any clear legal grounds, during which time her children were sent to foster families.
According to lawyer Asma Amireh, the woman was able to see her children only once during her detention. Then, after she was released, she was told that they had been placed in foster care.
She was forced to accept this as a fait accompli and stop asking to have them back, especially since they had by then adapted to their new lives.
Any legal redress would, in any case, have been too difficult, too long drawn out, and too costly for her.
The story of 16-year-old Omar is another example of female workers being deported without their children. Omar’s mother is a Sri Lankan domestic worker and his father an Indian worker.
He was living with his parents up to the time his mother was arrested under an administrative ruling for breaching the Law on Residence and Foreigners' Affairs.
She was deported without her son, because unpaid fines for overstaying his residency permit had accumulated since he was born and he had no identity papers at the time.
His father subsequently died and Omar was homeless for two years, during which time he suffered various forms of “sexual and physical” exploitation.
The boy was eventually deported and reunited with his mother, thanks to the cooperation of several parties - including Tamkeen, the Sri Lankan embassy,
and the ATUC - and the general amnesty for residency fines that came into effect in 2018.
Ali Al-Khasbeh, head of the Welfare and Alternative Families Department within the Jordanian Ministry of Social Development, explains that,
if a mother is held in administrative detention for violating labour or residency laws, her unregistered child (if newborn or under two years old) will be sent to the Al-Hussein Social Foundation.
If the child is over two, he is sent to another type of care home. This could be either a voluntary (private) or governmental, where he is given a national number and granted Jordanian citizenship.
During this same time, says Al-Khasbeh, an assessment of the child’s case is made, under the auspices of the Juvenile and Family Protection Department,
to see if the child could be sent to “alternative care”. This involves assessing a number of factors, including asking the mother about the child and the how serious and desirous she is to prove parentage,
and how feasible this is. Mothers who are migrant workers must also give their consent before their children can be handed over to these alternative families.
This consent must be obtained verbally or in writing, according to Al-Khasbeh.
At the same time, that there is a proportion of working women who opt to leave their children in Jordan of their own free will.
Social factors usually lurk behind this decision, such as having a child outside marriage, says Al-Khasbeh.
If the mother refuses to give up her child to an alternative family - whether the child’s parentage is "proven or unknown" - the child will remain in the social institution or care home until the mother’s
prison sentence ends, or until the procedures for establishing the child's parentage are completed.
Ali Al-Khasbeh – the official in the Welfare and Alternative Families Department of the Ministry of Social Development – also points out that the child can be returned to the birth family
if they can prove they are the parents. This is done through a court order, following which the child’s national number and Jordanian citizenship are withdrawn by Civil Status Department,
after they have been notified by the Ministry of Social Development.
We contacted the Juvenile and Family Protection Department of the Public Security Directorate, to ask them why children of female workers were being taken away.
But the department did not provide an answer or any information.
Embassies – diplomatic efforts and negligence
Mohammad Maaytah, assistant executive secretary of the ATUC, who is in charge of the Migrant Workers Support and Empowerment Centre,
thinks that embassies are clearly negligent in the way they deal with migrant workers who are their nationals, in particular with regard to documentation procedures and proving parentage.
The basic principle is that the embassies should establish parentage and issue birth certificates.
These are then authenticated by the Jordanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, says Maaytah, without the need to go through a long and expensive process to obtain legal protection.
"When a child obtains identity documents from their embassy, they become a legal person with standing in the world, regardless of their mother and father’s legal status in the kingdom."
For foreign workers to obtain birth certificates from their embassies in Jordan, they must first register the birth and obtain a birth certificate authenticated by the Jordanian authorities,
which brings us back to square one: the birth certificate!
Both Tamkeen and the Justice Centre for Legal Aid say that cooperation from embassies in issuing documents and facilitating transactions has helped to resolve problems related to
documenting and repatriating children. Yet there have been instances where embassies closed their doors to children, and cases of children coming from countries that did not have any diplomatic
representation in Jordan.
Maaytah emphasises that, when it comes to the problem of unregistered marriages and children, it is important for there to be clear legal
conditions in bilateral agreements governing migrant labour signed between the Jordanian government and that of other countries.
Maaytah also pointed to the problem migrant workers face if their countries follow Islamic law. This is because the child is considered “illegitimate”,
if the father does not acknowledge him or is absent, even if the child is the product of a relationship based on offer and acceptance and on the testimony of witnesses.
This is in contrast to some countries, which grant the mother the right to assign parenthood to the child, if the father is absent or fails to acknowledge the child.
Vicious Circle
The Tamkeen centre contacted the Ministry of Interior several times to try and resolve the problem of registering children of female migrant workers in Jordan,
offering a range of solutions. But the centre says it received no response to the official letters it sent.
Lawyer Asma Amireh says she believes the government is insufficiently aware of the extent of this problem and how serious its consequences are,
especially given the high percentage of informal workers. “Think about these children in ten years’ time… we’re going to see a whole generation that has not been educated or had proper health care.
Some of them may end up on the streets, homeless, and at risk of being bought and sold or exploited …them or their families.”
Case pending “indefinitely”
In August 2023, the Philippine Embassy in Jordan was granted a special concession - following nearly a decade of negotiations with the Jordanian Foreign Ministry - to repatriate, with their mothers,
children born out of wedlock in Jordan and to waive fines for overstaying. The embassy facilitated the issuing of both Philippine civil registration and travel documents.
The Migrant Workers Office in Jordan covered the cost of air and bus travel prior to departure.
The Philippine embassy subsequently announced that 40 children and their mothers had returned to the Philippines in batches, who had previously been prevented from returning because they did not have
Jordanian birth certificates - a condition for travel outside Jordan.
Roberto and his 49-year-old mother Melinda (not her real name) were not among these returnees. “I have no choice but to work,” says Melinda.
“I work to provide for my family in the Philippines and my son here, especially as his father isn’t around and has abandoned his responsibilities towards the child.
It would be hard to find another job if I went back home, as I’m elderly. And also there’s the problem of paying off the huge fines that have mounted up over the years.”
Even though she realises that she has broken the labour and residence laws, Melinda believes that her child should not be punished for what she has done by being deprived of his basic rights and being fined.
We contacted the Embassy of the Republic of Bangladesh in Jordan to ask them about documenting the children of migrant workers, both male and female.
Their response was that they could not grant citizenship to children in this category if there was no official marriage document/birth certificate.
They said: “Marriage is a legal contract. If it isn’t registered, of if there are loopholes in it, for any reason, it can’t be considered a marriage. There must be some form of documentation.”
The embassy has one or two cases a year of parents seeking to document their children. They contact the embassy from the detention centre and these unresolved
cases are referred to the Ministry of Interior in Bangladesh. The embassy has no solution, however, as the government back home cannot circumvent “the law".
They argue that those affected, while of Bangladeshi origin, are longtime residents of Jordan and are unable to prove a hereditary link to the state of Bangladesh.
As for the children of workers from Bangladesh, the embassy says that their cases remain under consideration.
This means they are shelved until further notice - which means no time soon - or rather, the embassy thinks that the host country is responsible for this issue: "At some point, we must find a solution."
We contacted the Philippine and Sri Lankan embassies. But, at the time of publication of this investigation, we are yet to receive a response.
This investigation was completed with support from ARIJ